You cannot see this page without javascript.


Today we take another look at facial recognition systems. These can tag friends in Facebook photos or help police identify suspects in the recent riots in Britain. Kurt Roemer is chief security strategist for Citrix Systems in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. He says technology makes it easier than ever for governments to identify and target people. "And it is very much a fine line between effective law enforcement and privacy."Kristene Unsworth researches information policy at Drexel College in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. She says she is concerned that governments and police are increasingly using facial recognition software without clearly defined policies. "There is so much secrecy around this information that we don't really know how these kind of images or other sorts of personal data points are being used, how long the information is being retained." Questions like these are part of a larger debate about privacy and free speech. After the riots, British Prime Minister David Cameron raised the possibility of interfering with social networks. He said the question was whether it would be right to stop people from communicating "when we know they are plotting violence, disorder and criminality."China's official news agency Xinhua says the British government "recognized that a balance needs to be struck between freedom and the monitoring of social media tools." Xinhua added, "We may wonder why western leaders, on the one hand, tend to indiscriminately accuse other nations of monitoring, but on the other take for granted their steps to monitor and control the Internet."Europe has some of the world's strongest policies on privacy rights. But Kurt Roemer says, like other western governments, they have not clearly defined their policies on new technologies. "China calling that out really shows that we have some issues to address here from a policy perspective, in addition to technology." One debate involves an action in San Francisco on August eleventh by the Bay Area Rapid Transit system. BART disabled wireless service in some of its underground stations for three hours. It says protesters were planning to use mobile devices to organize activities to disrupt train service. BART has faced protests over what activists say is police abuse by transit officers. BART says it acted to protect public safety. The American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California says the decision was in effect an effort by a government agency "to silence its critics." For VOA Special English, I'm Carolyn Presutti.

List of Articles
번호 제목 글쓴이 조회 수
72 Airport Security Could Go to 'Electronic Sniffer Dogs' chanyi 1675
71 Studying How Plastic Pollution Enters Ocean Food Supply chanyi 1076
» Facial Recognition Systems Bring Privacy Concerns file chanyi 1463
69 New Findings on Sleep in Children, Older Adults chanyi 698
68 A Campaign Against Alzheimer's Disease chanyi 3204
67 Advice for Staying Warm and Safe in Freezing Weather file chanyi 824
66 What the US 'Debt Ceiling' Means chanyi 658
65 Does Physical Activity Lead to Higher Grades? [1] chanyi 742
64 Gut Bacteria: We Are What We Eat chanyi 665
63 Let's Learn English Lesson 20: What Can You Do? chanyi 669
62 How to Make Your Own Solar Water Heater chanyi 881
61 How to Introduce Yourself Like an American? chanyi 551
60 For Many People, First the Doctor's Office, Then the Web chanyi 710
59 Drum Circle Widens Into a United Nations of Beats chanyi 629
58 Using the Internet and Social Media to Search for a Job chanyi 944
본 사이트에서는 회원분들의 게시된 이메일 주소가 무단으로 수집되는 것을 거부합니다. 게시된 정보 및 게시물의 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료제공자에게 있습니다. 이메일 Copyright © 2001 - 2022 All Right Reserved.
커뮤니티new학생의방교사의 방일반영어진로와 진학영어회화